Comments on: To Arial or not to Arial http://mittermayr.wordpress.com/2006/02/04/to-arial-or-not-to-arial/ Let's get it started, we're already late. Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:39:02 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Olly http://mittermayr.wordpress.com/2006/02/04/to-arial-or-not-to-arial/#comment-125 Olly Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:26:01 +0000 http://mittermayr.wordpress.com/2006/02/04/to-arial-or-not-to-arial/#comment-125 I'm tending towards lucida these day, eg: h1 { font-size: 2.75em; font-family: "Lucida Sans Unicode", "Lucida Grande", "Trebuchet MS", Verdana, "Bitstream Vera Sans", Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-weight: normal; } I’m tending towards lucida these day, eg:

h1 {
font-size: 2.75em;
font-family: “Lucida Sans Unicode”, “Lucida Grande”, “Trebuchet MS”, Verdana, “Bitstream Vera Sans”, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-weight: normal;
}

]]> By: Sergey Ioffe http://mittermayr.wordpress.com/2006/02/04/to-arial-or-not-to-arial/#comment-37 Sergey Ioffe Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:46:16 +0000 http://mittermayr.wordpress.com/2006/02/04/to-arial-or-not-to-arial/#comment-37 This is a scientifically proven fact that serif fonts are more readabe in higher resolution, Non-serif in lower. The longing for increasing of font sizes in 2.0Culture makes me happy! This is a scientifically proven fact that serif fonts are more readabe in higher resolution, Non-serif in lower. The longing for increasing of font sizes in 2.0Culture makes me happy!

]]>